Quantum Histories and Their Implications

Classical mechanics and standard Copenhagen quantum mechanics respect subspace implications. For example, if a particle is confined in a particular region $R$ of space, then in these theories we can deduce that it is confined in regions containing $R$. However, subspace implications are generally violated by versions of quantum theory that assign probabilities to histories, such as the consistent histories approach. I define here a new criterion, ordered consistency, which refines the criterion of consistency and has the property that inferences made by ordered consistent sets do not violate subspace relations. This raises the question: do the operators defining our observations form an ordered consistent history? If so, ordered consistency defines a version of quantum theory with greater predictive power than the consistent histories formalism. If not, and our observations are defined by a non-ordered consistent quantum history, then subspace implications are not generally valid.Comment: To appear in ``Relativistic Quantum Measurement and Decoherence'', F. Petruccione (ed.), Springer-Verla

Quantum nonlocal correlations are not dominated

We show that no probability distribution of spin measurement outcomes on pairs of spin 1/2 particles is unambiguously more nonlocal than the quantum correlations. That is, any distribution that produces a CHSH violation larger than the quantum violation for some axis choices also produces a smaller CHSH violation for some other axis choices. In this sense, it is not possible for nature to be strictly more nonlocal than quantum theory allows

Testing Causal Quantum Theory

Causal quantum theory assumes that measurements or collapses are well-defined physical processes, localised in space-time, and never give perfectly reliable outcomes and that the outcome of one measurement only influences the outcomes of others within its future light cone. Although the theory has unusual properties, it is not immediately evident that it is inconsistent with experiment to date. I discuss its implications and experimental tests.Comment: Accepted manuscrip

Quantum imaging: Scattered observations on "Copenhagen"

Remarks on Michael Frayn's play "Copenhagen"

A critical look at risk assessments for global catastrophes

Recent papers by Busza et al. (BJSW) and Dar et al. (DDH) argue that astrophysical data can be used to establish small bounds on the risk of a "killer strangelet" catastrophe scenario in the RHIC and ALICE collider experiments. DDH and other commentators (initially including BJSW) suggested that these empirical bounds alone do give sufficient reassurance. This seems unsupportable when the bounds are expressed in terms of expected cost -- a good measure, according to standard risk analysis arguments. For example, DDH's main bound, $p_{\rm catastrophe} < 2 \times 10^{-8}$, implies only that the expectation value of the number of deaths is bounded by 120. This paper reappraises the DDH and BJSW risk bounds by comparing risk policy in other areas. For example, it is noted that, even if highly risk tolerant assumptions are made and no value is placed on the lives of future generations, a catastrophe risk no higher than $\approx 10^{-15}$ per year would be required for consistency with established policy for radiation hazard risk minimization. It is concluded that the costs of small risks of catastrophe have been significantly underestimated by BJSW (initially), by DDH and by other commentators. Lessons for future policy are proposed.Comment: Minor corrections and note added July 2015. Previous arxiv version corresponds to 2004 journal published versio

A Proposed Test of the Local Causality of Spacetime

A theory governing the metric and matter fields in spacetime is {\it locally causal} if the probability distribution for the fields in any region is determined solely by physical data in the region's past, i.e. it is independent of events at space-like separated points. General relativity is manifestly locally causal, since the fields in a region are completely determined by physical data in its past. It is natural to ask whether other possible theories in which the fundamental description of space-time is classical and geometric -- for instance, hypothetical theories which stochastically couple a classical spacetime geometry to a quantum field theory of matter -- might also be locally causal. A quantum theory of gravity, on the other hand, should allow the creation of spacetimes which violate local causality at the macroscopic level. This paper describes an experiment to test the local causality of spacetime, and hence to test whether or not gravity behaves as quantum theories of gravity suggest, in this respect. The experiment will either produce direct evidence that the gravitational field is not locally causal, and thus weak confirmation of quantum gravity, or else identify a definite limit to the domain of validity of quantum theory.Comment: Further clarifications and addition

Consistent Sets Yield Contrary Inferences in Quantum Theory

In the consistent histories formulation of quantum theory, the probabilistic predictions and retrodictions made from observed data depend on the choice of a consistent set. We show that this freedom allows the formalism to retrodict contrary propositions which correspond to orthogonal commuting projections and which each have probability one. We also show that the formalism makes contrary probability one predictions when applied to Gell-Mann and Hartle's generalised time-neutral quantum mechanics.Comment: 10 pages, TeX with harvmac. Revised version, with extended discussion and references added. To appear in Phys. Rev. Let

Unconstrained Summoning for relativistic quantum information processing

We define a summoning task to require propagating an unknown quantum state to a point in space-time belonging to a set determined by classical inputs at points in space-time. We consider the classical analogue, in which a known classical state must be returned at precisely one allowed point. We show that, when the inputs are unconstrained, any summoning task that is possible in the classical case is also possible in the quantum case.Comment: Explanatory comments added. Minor typos corrected. Title expanded. Accepted versio

Semi-quantum Gravity and Testing Gravitational Bell Non-locality

Semi-classical gravity attempts to define a hybrid theory in which a classical gravitational field is coupled to a unitarily evolving quantum state. Although semi-classical gravity is inconsistent with observation, a viable theory of this type might be appealing, since it potentially might preserve the basic features of our two most successful theories while unifying them. It might also offer a natural solution to the quantum measurement problem. I explore the scope for such "semi-quantum" hybrid theories, and note some interesting, though daunting, constraints. Consistency with observation generally requires pyschophysical parallelism with the classical gravitational field rather than the quantum matter. Solvability suggests the gravitational field at a point should be determined by physics in its past light cone, which requires local hidden variables and predicts anomalously non-Newtonian gravitational fields. These predictions could be tested by low energy, although technologically challenging, experiments in which the Bell non-locality of the gravitational field is verified by direct measurement.Comment: Draft circulated for comment. Not for the foundationally faint-hearte

Quantum Theory's Reality Problem

This review, intended for a popular audience, was originally published in the online magazine Aeon on 28 January 2014. It is reproduced on the arxiv with permission. The online version (without references) can be found at https://aeon.co/essays/what-really-happens-in-schrodinger-s-box.Comment: Typo correcte